#8029115 - 01/03/15 01:50 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: MetalheaD]
|
flyEX #1
Man in the Box
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 01/05/00
Posts: 26631
Loc: Down in a Hole
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8029160 - 01/03/15 02:47 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Sir Salty A F]
|
tenplanescrashing
tenplanescrashing
Unregistered
|
My guess is it's flickr. They probably have an optimal size that you should upload that they'll compress "properly", similarly to how Facebook does it.
This is why I refuse to post any of my photos on a photo hosting site because they typically look like shit after they go through their own compressions.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8034444 - 01/06/15 09:42 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Senor Eduardo_82]
|
Sir Salty A F
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 01/24/12
Posts: 15608
Loc: Utah
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8035872 - 01/07/15 05:22 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Sir Salty A F]
|
tenplanescrashing
tenplanescrashing
Unregistered
|
Am I the only one who sees a significant amount of banding in that photo?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8035979 - 01/07/15 06:51 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: ]
|
Nate047
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 03/03/03
Posts: 28558
Loc: La La Land, CA
|
I'd like to know the story behind that shot as well.
Nate
_________________________
natehasslerphoto.comFlickrFacebook"Nate047 > NateSTL" - TenTwelve "As long as I have a face, you'll always have a place to sit." - SlowBlackCar *insert picture of stock Fit here*
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8036379 - 01/08/15 12:31 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Sir Salty A F]
|
Sir Salty A F
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 01/24/12
Posts: 15608
Loc: Utah
|
so, click this link... it's an image i posted earlier. looking at it on here vs flickr it looks much cleaner on flickrs page. does it have all the artifacts when viewed from the link?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/vortac1/15981961387/in/photostream/
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8036397 - 01/08/15 12:42 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: ]
|
tylerdurden
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 03/31/02
Posts: 25887
Loc: Shyea, like I'm telling you
|
The site shouldn't render anything differently...the only thing that would affect image rendering would be the host or the browser. But it is only his that has this, so either it is intentional, part of his PP, or his host.
Going back to this in light of the recent salty post, and I'm telling you it's not true. There are other sites for sure and even some other forums that display retina ready images. No image on this site, ever, looks as good as a JPEG I can upload to imgur, let alone what it looks like in PS or LR.
Go to olafphotoblog.com or fujivsfuji.com and tell me photos look the same as they do here.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8036968 - 01/08/15 11:36 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Sir Salty A F]
|
tenplanescrashing
tenplanescrashing
Unregistered
|
Am I the only one who sees a significant amount of banding in that photo? Dude... Are you going to point this out in every pic I post? I get it... Something isn't translating from my monitor to clubsi... It is what it is. Wow, wasn't trying to ruffle the panties. I have never noticed the banding before in your shots, I just happen to notice it in this shot.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8036973 - 01/08/15 11:39 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: tylerdurden]
|
tenplanescrashing
tenplanescrashing
Unregistered
|
The site shouldn't render anything differently...the only thing that would affect image rendering would be the host or the browser. But it is only his that has this, so either it is intentional, part of his PP, or his host. Going back to this in light of the recent salty post, and I'm telling you it's not true. There are other sites for sure and even some other forums that display retina ready images. No image on this site, ever, looks as good as a JPEG I can upload to imgur, let alone what it looks like in PS or LR. Go to olafphotoblog.com or fujivsfuji.com and tell me photos look the same as they do here. I haven't seen any other image on this site, posted as a photography photo, do that. None of Nate's images have an issue, none of the ones i've posted from my personal site (no compression) have an issue, hence why've i've been asking the question. This is typical of a compression tool when a photo is uploaded to a photo hosting site so I just wanted to call it out and see if that was the case or not.
I'm not trying to bag on anyone or say their photos suck, it's just a general observation. If someone has taken it otherwise, I apologize.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8036978 - 01/08/15 11:43 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Sir Salty A F]
|
tenplanescrashing
tenplanescrashing
Unregistered
|
Yeah.. I overreacted a bit there.. Just frustrated trying to figure out why the images are sucking on here..
How are they looking if you click on the links I posted above? No worries.
The first one of the road still has a bit of the grit there, may be because of sharpening, but I can tell you that it is much better looking through that link than the JPEG referenced here.
The one I mentioned banding about, I didn't see it at all on the site.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8037733 - 01/08/15 06:12 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Sir Salty A F]
|
I am Legend
I am Legend
Unregistered
|
Don't know what it is but you're right...something isn't working right when you links.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8038094 - 01/09/15 12:18 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Anonymous]
|
tylerdurden
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 03/31/02
Posts: 25887
Loc: Shyea, like I'm telling you
|
Still looks terrible, but slightly less so. Smoother, but also fuzzy.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8039978 - 01/10/15 01:33 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: ewraven]
|
LNXGUY
Tougher than Logan Roy
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 107840
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
After checking all I use are the BBCode links as well.
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#8040999 - 01/11/15 08:22 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Duc]
|
chef
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 04/27/00
Posts: 23758
Loc: The OC
|
This portrait workshop I'm involved in, you study a photographers work then make an image inspired by them
This is my Karsh inspired image. light on the paper, a light camera right behind him on the hair and shoulder, a light camera right with a 15 degree grid on his face, a light with a bare strip box camera left behind him.
and this is a Skrebneski inspired image. a beauty dish over her, butterfly lighting style. I think there was also a strip light just to her right, at a really low power. I think I left it on though not really aimed or intentionally used. Skrebneski would say that nobody ever told him to hold still, so he made a lot of images with motion blur. I liked that, and the primary image I made was about migraines and pain and my wife, but this and the one I'll post tomorrow were just variations and playing around.
_________________________
Why choose mac? "Well, huh, might as, might as well ask why is a tree good? Why is the sunset good? Why are boobs good?" RRLSi "put that money into a new imac damn it. it's the bomb" jsmonet "This all fuckin' day. Feel the 900MB/sec of glory. It's like a digital money shot all over your face." RRLSi Order my photo prints (New files uploaded)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: jsmonet, x, 2000SiRacer, Professor Paki
|
|