Page 2 of 3 <123>
Topic Options
#4555760 - 03/01/10 04:37 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: FCobra94]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
it all depends on what you are thinking going in.

if you are expecting a 10 sec car than of course youd be let down. But over all it drives great.

I also think an s2k lives up to its hype to.
if Im driving new cars I try to forget what ive read about it. I dont go in expecting the world because besides some high end exotic youll be let down every single time.
_________________________

Top
Videos
#4555848 - 03/01/10 04:59 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: Euphoricuck]
danl Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/14/00
Posts: 12783
Loc: Maryland USA
I have definitely driven sub 30K cars that have impressed the hell out of me. Maybe I'm easily impressed?

Also I'd take a mint 90-91 crx Si over an ITR anyday though.
_________________________
“ the only people that care about this aren't car people anyway. we don't consider EVs for anything other than point to point transportation like a bus or a plane. do you care how fast your plane can taxi down the runway?

the dodge is a drag strip monster, and a hell of a good one at that.”
-Rex B16, June 11 2024

Top
#4555961 - 03/01/10 05:29 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: danl]
NOT spotch... Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/25/00
Posts: 57253
 Originally Posted By: danl

Also I'd take a mint 90-91 crx Si over an ITR anyday though.



Hrm... maybe. The 400 pound weight savings is attractive, for sure.

Top
#4555995 - 03/01/10 05:37 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: NOT spotch...]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
itr > crx si
imo.

way better engine, chassis etc
_________________________

Top
#4556047 - 03/01/10 05:54 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: Euphoricuck]
OnyxEros Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 02/17/03
Posts: 18417
Loc: Seattle
my evo doesn't live up to the hype. the handling is decent but it's mostly in the $300/per tires
_________________________
12/19/24 "Musk is a more dangerous threat than even trump. He's not an elected official, meaning his accountability isn't to the american people. He also isn't driven by money, or approval ratings...he's driven by the need for power. He will find a way to skirt accountability and grow unchecked power at every turn."

Top
#4556529 - 03/01/10 08:57 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: NOHC]
LNXGUY Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 108755
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
The Type R was one of the funnest cars I've ever driven.

Yes it's a torqueless wonder but 8k rpm more then makes up for it.

Give me one in championship white with the JDM front end and that's it. No other mods.
_________________________
-Bill
The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children.
Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy


Top
#4556643 - 03/01/10 09:33 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: scootergeek]
kyden Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 12/20/99
Posts: 15410
Loc: Providence, RI
 Originally Posted By: scootergeek
chipped ignition keys/immobilizers were a brilliant invention. No help against tow truck thieves, but they'll stop kids dead in their tracks.

My SRT-4 was parked behind the minivan for two of the thefts and they didn't even try to get in it.


the 00-01 type r's had immobilizers. but with jumper harnesses available all they had to do is unplug the ecu and plug in another one, and they're on their way.
_________________________
<x> i had a weird dream <x> where i lived in an apartment complex <x> walked down the street, and kyden and a couple other dudes were living in an apartment and ran outside looking for the maintenance people <x> and something about taking a shit in a sealed toilet

Top
#4556783 - 03/01/10 10:32 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: kyden]
cacasesi Offline
Say my name!
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 06/01/00
Posts: 11499
So the best sport compact from a decade ago vs. arguably the weakest sport compact of today? With far superior tires on the old car?

I think every other car maker could say their new model "X" is faster in every way than their decade old version of "X"... exept Honda, and sadly Toyota because they put their balls away back in 1997.

Top
#4556821 - 03/01/10 10:53 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: cacasesi]
scootergeek Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/24/00
Posts: 46248
Loc: East of St. Louis
 Originally Posted By: cacasesi
So the best sport compact from a decade ago vs. arguably the weakest sport compact of today? With far superior tires on the old car?

I think every other car maker could say their new model "X" is faster in every way than their decade old version of "X"... exept Honda, and sadly Toyota because they put their balls away back in 1997.


Not when it comes to compact fwd performance. Dodge sucks, Ford is supposed to stop sucking soon, but sucks at the moment. Chevy is better, but only because the Cavalier was sooooo terrible. Nissan sucks now. Don't know how an MS3 handles compared to the MSP but it currently looks like hell, the MX5 is worse than the MS Miata. The Mini is better than a decade ago and the Koreans suck less I guess. VW is up.

It's a weirdly dead market given the upswing in "premium" small cars. Though it should rebound nicely in the next year or two thanks to Ford and Fiat. Honda has the parts bin to make a killer Fit, just not the will.

cheers,
scott
_________________________
Still pissy after all these years...

Top
#4556848 - 03/01/10 11:06 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: scootergeek]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
there really is no point. we(enthusiasts) who enjoy those kinds of cars are a very small market.


you dont like the new miata? i like the fact it actually comes with side airbags now.
_________________________

Top
#4556849 - 03/01/10 11:06 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: scootergeek]
kyden Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 12/20/99
Posts: 15410
Loc: Providence, RI
honda should put the k20a3 in the fit. or even like the 1.8 out of the civic. but that would make it a 20k dollar fit though i suppose.

not that i can think of many people that would buy that though when they can spend a small amount more and get an si, lol.
_________________________
<x> i had a weird dream <x> where i lived in an apartment complex <x> walked down the street, and kyden and a couple other dudes were living in an apartment and ran outside looking for the maintenance people <x> and something about taking a shit in a sealed toilet

Top
#4556875 - 03/01/10 11:17 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: scootergeek]
cacasesi Offline
Say my name!
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 06/01/00
Posts: 11499
I dunno. A Caliber SRT-4 (/shivers) is still quicker than an ACR Neon (/lightsfuse), right? And if it isn't, the real SRT-4 was. Though I know some will argue the orginial ACR was more fun.

The Cobalt SS is the best small Chevy ever.

Yeah, Ford's out for now in the US market.

Nissan still makes the same Sentra SE-R they always have, lol. Sucked then, sucks now.

Any MS3 owns the MSP.

MKV/MKVI GTIs are a big step up from a MKIV.

A Fit Type R with a K20 would be a hoot.

Top
#4556954 - 03/01/10 11:43 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: cacasesi]
scootergeek Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/24/00
Posts: 46248
Loc: East of St. Louis
 Originally Posted By: cacasesi
I dunno. A Caliber SRT-4 (/shivers) is still quicker than an ACR Neon (/lightsfuse), right? And if it isn't, the real SRT-4 was. Though I know some will argue the orginial ACR was more fun.


Not if there's a turn in the road, and even in a straight line, you're still stuck in a Caliber. The Neon may have had low rent plastics but it was at least a halfway pleasant looking design. I never got to drive a Neon SRT-4 ACR, but it might have been just the push to make me forget the 1g Neon ACR.

I know the MS3 motor is better, but what about the handling dynamics? People used to rave about the MSP (though it couldn't compete with a 2g Neon ACR on an autocross course according to GRM).

cheers,
scott
_________________________
Still pissy after all these years...

Top
#4556966 - 03/01/10 11:47 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: cacasesi]
Serendipitous Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 04/30/01
Posts: 15300
Loc: Northern California
The NC MX-5 is better in almost every way (styling excluded) than the NB, including the MSM. The MSM is faster in a straight line, but the new car is just plain fantastic. Lighter, too!

 Originally Posted By: cacasesi
I dunno. A Caliber SRT-4 (/shivers) is still quicker than an ACR Neon (/lightsfuse), right? And if it isn't, the real SRT-4 was. Though I know some will argue the orginial ACR was more fun.

The Cobalt SS is the best small Chevy ever.

Yeah, Ford's out for now in the US market.

Nissan still makes the same Sentra SE-R they always have, lol. Sucked then, sucks now.

Any MS3 owns the MSP.

MKV/MKVI GTIs are a big step up from a MKIV.

A Fit Type R with a K20 would be a hoot.


I would rather an ITR than any of those cars you listed.

Top
#4557857 - 03/02/10 10:40 AM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: OnyxEros]
FCobra94 Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 10/22/01
Posts: 19689
Loc: MD
 Originally Posted By: OnyxEros
my evo doesn't live up to the hype. the handling is decent but it's mostly in the $300/per tires

Word? That's a damn shame...can I have it? \:\)
_________________________
'07 335i

Top
#4557935 - 03/02/10 11:02 AM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: FCobra94]
NOT spotch... Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/25/00
Posts: 57253
 Originally Posted By: FCobra94
 Originally Posted By: OnyxEros
my evo doesn't live up to the hype. the handling is decent but it's mostly in the $300/per tires

Word? That's a damn shame...can I have it? \:\)



Yeah really!

Top
#4558022 - 03/02/10 11:28 AM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: NOT spotch...]
OnyxEros Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 02/17/03
Posts: 18417
Loc: Seattle
 Originally Posted By: spotch
 Originally Posted By: FCobra94
 Originally Posted By: OnyxEros
my evo doesn't live up to the hype. the handling is decent but it's mostly in the $300/per tires

Word? That's a damn shame...can I have it? \:\)



Yeah really!


sure, for $25k ;\)

But seriously, the factory alignment sucks (got that fixed) it still eats the inner edge of the tires after 10k miles.

The tires do alot for that car, without them it wouldn't handle nearly as well nor would it stop as well.

sure mods wake up the car but that's no longer a stock car.

outside of those things it is reliable...it should be since it hasn't cracked 21k miles yet

my sentra is more fun \:D but way less reliable \:\(
_________________________
12/19/24 "Musk is a more dangerous threat than even trump. He's not an elected official, meaning his accountability isn't to the american people. He also isn't driven by money, or approval ratings...he's driven by the need for power. He will find a way to skirt accountability and grow unchecked power at every turn."

Top
#4558125 - 03/02/10 11:54 AM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: OnyxEros]
Z24 lol Offline
and Fuck you for the new name lol
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 06/08/00
Posts: 43359
Loc: Lovely CONROE, TX! YEE-HA!
Nissan could have had a killer SE-R. They couldve put the POS QR25DE in the base SER and given the Spec-v the SR20DET.
Top
#4558216 - 03/02/10 12:06 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: cacasesi]
NOT spotch... Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/25/00
Posts: 57253
 Originally Posted By: cacasesi
I dunno. A Caliber SRT-4 (/shivers) is still quicker than an ACR Neon (/lightsfuse), right? And if it isn't, the real SRT-4 was. Though I know some will argue the orginial ACR was more fun.

The Cobalt SS is the best small Chevy ever.

Yeah, Ford's out for now in the US market.

Nissan still makes the same Sentra SE-R they always have, lol. Sucked then, sucks now.

Any MS3 owns the MSP.

MKV/MKVI GTIs are a big step up from a MKIV.

A Fit Type R with a K20 would be a hoot.



I agree that Chevy and VW stepped up, but the MS3 is mainly touted for its power. The suspension is nothing earth-shattering, and it weighs a bunch more than the msp (which actually seemed to have a better suspension too). The SE-R has sucked AT THE VERY LEAST since the late 90s, and you can make a strong argument that they've sucked since the mid 90s. The new caliber is minivan sized, minivan stanced lol center of gravity what?, and minivan weighted, and is a huge step down from the SRT4 ACR (which, handling-wise, never topped the original 1g neon ACR).

I love the newer miatas, but it took them until now to get them right. the 06, 07,08 miatas were good but the suspension wasn't quite right and the engine revved too low (hp peak AT redline). They tweaked the suspension, gave the engine the internals it should have had to begin with, and now I could possibly see choosing one over a 99-00 sport. After stewing on it for a while, I don't see the NC miata as a huge step foward over the early NB miatas. Much structurally stiffer, more powerful, better gas mileage, yes, but also heavier (unless you're talking 05 mazdaspeed), taller, and funkier seating position. They say the ND will be a big improvement over the NC (lighter, etc) so we'll see. I have faith.

Anyway, aside from the cobalt and new GTI, there's a definite trend of manufacturers putting more emphasis on "hey look, here's an extra 50hp!" rather than "hey look, this car talks to you like an itr!" because hp does sell cars and it's the easiest way to please even the most idiotic of car-buyers that think everything feels the same in the curves as long as it feels like a rocket as soon as the road straightens out.

Top
#4558252 - 03/02/10 12:14 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: NOT spotch...]
OnyxEros Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 02/17/03
Posts: 18417
Loc: Seattle
The 2.0 genesis coupe is alive and well. I don't see too many of them on the road nor do i see too many for sale.

it has all the proper ingredients for the best sport compact around.
_________________________
12/19/24 "Musk is a more dangerous threat than even trump. He's not an elected official, meaning his accountability isn't to the american people. He also isn't driven by money, or approval ratings...he's driven by the need for power. He will find a way to skirt accountability and grow unchecked power at every turn."

Top
#4558283 - 03/02/10 12:25 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: OnyxEros]
Quad4_driver Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 09/28/02
Posts: 11119
Loc: B.C. Canada
I'd just like to point out that the GTZ was a very capable car in the turns, as well as no slouch in a straight line. The only thing they suffered from performance wise, was under sized brakes.

Shame the last one was built in 1994. While a an ITR was faster in everyway, they were good competition against GSRs.

Top
#4558287 - 03/02/10 12:27 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: OnyxEros]
NOT spotch... Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/25/00
Posts: 57253
Yeah, except the genesis transmission apparently shifts like ass and is prone to breakage even without 'abuse'. Still, you would think they would sell better than they have thus far. I guess it being a sporty Hyundai it will take a little time (and better transmissions) to catch on.
Top
#4558355 - 03/02/10 12:51 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: Quad4_driver]
Serendipitous Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 04/30/01
Posts: 15300
Loc: Northern California
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0a9qVWn2d8

Complete list of people that cross shop ITR and GTZ:

Quad4_driver

\:D

Top
#4558361 - 03/02/10 12:53 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: Serendipitous]
NOT spotch... Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/25/00
Posts: 57253
Take that, top gear!


Top
#4558380 - 03/02/10 12:58 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: NOT spotch...]
NOT spotch... Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/25/00
Posts: 57253
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA.
Holy motherfuck. The shifter demonstration was fucking amazing.

In motorweek's defense, kudos for them including the words "like a corvette" in the GTZ review (even if it is talking about the rough suspension).

Jesus, hand-pump lumbar support?

part of me wants to say "Well, it was the early 90s", but then again, that dash/shifter/hand-pump/seats have GM written all over them lol
_________________________
"On the street where there is no lap timer, feel is all that matters" - scootergeek
"A bunch of nerdy douchebags chasing a ghost." -Ob1 on bitcoin

Top
#4558399 - 03/02/10 01:04 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: OnyxEros]
FCobra94 Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 10/22/01
Posts: 19689
Loc: MD
 Originally Posted By: OnyxEros
 Originally Posted By: spotch
 Originally Posted By: FCobra94
 Originally Posted By: OnyxEros
my evo doesn't live up to the hype. the handling is decent but it's mostly in the $300/per tires

Word? That's a damn shame...can I have it? \:\)



Yeah really!


sure, for $25k ;\)

Ok...how far do you live away from MD lol serious face
_________________________
'07 335i

Top
#4558457 - 03/02/10 01:22 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: NOT spotch...]
OnyxEros Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 02/17/03
Posts: 18417
Loc: Seattle
 Originally Posted By: spotch
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA.
Holy motherfuck. The shifter demonstration was fucking amazing.

In motorweek's defense, kudos for them including the words "like a corvette" in the GTZ review (even if it is talking about the rough suspension).

Jesus, hand-pump lumbar support?

part of me wants to say "Well, it was the early 90s", but then again, that dash/shifter/hand-pump/seats have GM written all over them lol


me and my dad use to watch this program. the music brings me back
_________________________
12/19/24 "Musk is a more dangerous threat than even trump. He's not an elected official, meaning his accountability isn't to the american people. He also isn't driven by money, or approval ratings...he's driven by the need for power. He will find a way to skirt accountability and grow unchecked power at every turn."

Top
#4558475 - 03/02/10 01:25 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: FCobra94]
OnyxEros Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 02/17/03
Posts: 18417
Loc: Seattle
 Originally Posted By: FCobra94
 Originally Posted By: OnyxEros
 Originally Posted By: spotch
 Originally Posted By: FCobra94
 Originally Posted By: OnyxEros
my evo doesn't live up to the hype. the handling is decent but it's mostly in the $300/per tires

Word? That's a damn shame...can I have it? \:\)



Yeah really!


sure, for $25k ;\)

Ok...how far do you live away from MD lol serious face


i am about 2500 miles away we can split shipping
_________________________
12/19/24 "Musk is a more dangerous threat than even trump. He's not an elected official, meaning his accountability isn't to the american people. He also isn't driven by money, or approval ratings...he's driven by the need for power. He will find a way to skirt accountability and grow unchecked power at every turn."

Top
#4558492 - 03/02/10 01:29 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: OnyxEros]
Serendipitous Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 04/30/01
Posts: 15300
Loc: Northern California
 Originally Posted By: OnyxEros
me and my dad use to watch this program. the music brings me back


The best part about it is when they are testing something like a 911 GT3 and they open the trunk/hood and tell you how much cubic feet of cargo space it has

Top
#4558897 - 03/02/10 03:12 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: NOT spotch...]
Quad4_driver Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 09/28/02
Posts: 11119
Loc: B.C. Canada
 Originally Posted By: spotch
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA.
Holy motherfuck. The shifter demonstration was fucking amazing.

In motorweek's defense, kudos for them including the words "like a corvette" in the GTZ review (even if it is talking about the rough suspension).

Jesus, hand-pump lumbar support?

part of me wants to say "Well, it was the early 90s", but then again, that dash/shifter/hand-pump/seats have GM written all over them lol


You know I was watching that video just before I posted that too.

Yes the shifters really were that loud and yes they are notchy. However they have very postive and well defined gates. It's similar to shifting a T56.

Oh I have no excuse for the interior. Only thing i can say is that grand ams was nicer, mine had a dial knob on the side of the seat. Oh and they are faster cars then tested, def low 15s stock.

EDIT: Oh yeah there times are all over the place too, they got a 14.5 out a 4 door GSR. WTF?!?!

Top
#4559123 - 03/02/10 04:10 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: Quad4_driver]
NOT spotch... Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/25/00
Posts: 57253
I know dude, I'm sorry, I just couldn't help but laugh at some of the stuff \:\( I tried to be more supportive, but the inside of that car was so 80s/90s GM it overwhelmed my best efforts.
Top
#4559155 - 03/02/10 04:21 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: NOT spotch...]
Quad4_driver Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 09/28/02
Posts: 11119
Loc: B.C. Canada
Oh I understand. The beretta had pretty much the worst interior GM ever made.
Top
#4559280 - 03/02/10 04:46 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: Quad4_driver]
Serendipitous Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 04/30/01
Posts: 15300
Loc: Northern California
I tried to find a picture of one of those NOHC-era GTP interiors to counter with, but apparently the internet has rejected their existence.
Top
#4559570 - 03/02/10 06:48 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: Euphoricuck]
danl Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/14/00
Posts: 12783
Loc: Maryland USA
 Originally Posted By: Euphoric
itr > crx si
imo.

way better engine, chassis etc


My theory is that if I have to deal with no power it may as well be with light weight. From what I recall (driving my friends) the CRX was 108 hp and 110 ft-lbs of torque with a nice gearbox and good midrange torque. It didn't have much power but you could short shift the car when tearing up the mountain roads and not suffer too badly. The brakes sucked on the CRX as they do pretty much any honda from the 1990's though. They were something like 2188 lbs, so drop the spare/jack, that little cargo thing in the rear and you have a fun little hatch, 30+ mpg, can carry the mountain bike, and is a blast to drive.
_________________________
“ the only people that care about this aren't car people anyway. we don't consider EVs for anything other than point to point transportation like a bus or a plane. do you care how fast your plane can taxi down the runway?

the dodge is a drag strip monster, and a hell of a good one at that.”
-Rex B16, June 11 2024

Top
#4559675 - 03/02/10 07:29 PM Re: A look back at the original ITR [Re: danl]
NOT spotch... Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/25/00
Posts: 57253
Hrm. Yeah dan, tough call. The integra has a shit-ton of interior room too once you put the hatch down. I carried an insane amount of stuff in mine over the years (bar stools, oversized dogs, etc). I hear what you're saying about wanting a lightweight car if it's gotta be low-powered, but you gotta remember, you're gaining 87hp increase for just an extra 400pounds of weight. In the grand scheme of things they're both slow, but the ITR has a ton more power/weight. You know? I'd be real happy in either, to be honest. I'd probably just lean ITR if I had to choose.
Top
Page 2 of 3 <123>


Moderator:  auxilary, The Mad Paki 
Hop to:
Shout Box

CSi Sponsors
Civic Type-R 2-Piece Rotors — $814 Front Pair! Made in England!
View EBC Rotors
ClubSi.com Shirts
StopTech NZ
StopTech New Zealand
StopTech Australia
StopTech Australia
Brake Specials
Contact BuyBrakes
Brake Pad Coupon
Use Code: hondafetish
Advertisement

| Brake Pads | | How To Change Brake Pads | | Drilled Slotted Brake Kits Cheap | EBC Brake Kits | Performance Brake Kits | Brake Specials Near Me | How To Replace Brake Pads