|
|
|||||||
ER,,,probably... heheh Shamelessly stolen from Rawfish's post in Out There,as quoted from Eric Hsu. Quote: 1. The Hyundai 4B11T is not the same as the Mitsubishi EVO X 4B11T. While the Hyundai 4B is similar in many ways, there are very few common parts. The block, head, pistons, rods, crank, etc. are all similar, but different. Different in that they are lower grade. Hyundai’s rods are powder sintered whereas Mitsubishi’s are forged. Mitsubishi’s pistons are made by Mahle and have a oil reservoir underneath the dish like a Porsche turbo piston. Hyundai’s cast piston is no different in strength compared to one of their passenger cars. Hyundai’s 4B block has far less webbing (this is visible from the exterior). The differences go on and on. That doesn’t mean the Hyundai parts suck. It’s just that the Mitsubishi 4B11T is way better out of the box. While the parts are different, that doesn’t mean that the Mitsubishi pistons, rods, and crank cannot fit into a Hyundai 4B. 2. The cylinder head is different enough that the exhaust manifold and intake manifold flanges and gaskets are not common. They are absolutely different so there will be no manifold and turbo swapping. This is an absolute fact since Gary tried fitting the manifolds from an EVO X. The Mitsu engine is mounted transverse and it is very likely that the castings wouldn’t work anyway. That’s too bad since the Cosworth EVO X 4B11T CNC ported big valve cylinder head will be available to the public soon. See #6 below on the cams. 3. The LSD in the sports version is a gear type LSD and not a clutch type. 4. There is an orifice in the clutch’s hydraulic plumbing that needs to be removed for performance purposes (as do many other cars). 5. The Hyundai V-6 is very similar in design to the Nissan VQ35. If you’re going to make a new V6, you’d be a fool not to copy, oh sorry uh….model your new engine after the VQ35 since it is the best damn V6 in production right now. 6. While the cams are SIMILAR in appearance, they may not be identical like the GenesisDriven blog states. The blog post states that their Korean source says, “With your pictures send to Korea, our engineer and tech dept. have confirmed its identical as 2.0 turbo Theta for those cams.” I’m not sure what kind of engineer looks at a picture on a computer screen, makes a foolish assumption, and says, “Yep, those are identical.” I don’t think I want that engineer designing my parts. Regardless, the Hyundai and Mitsu 4B11T camshafts need to be precisely measured before saying that they are “identical”. I sure hope they’re the same because Cosworth already offers the best damn EVO X cams that money can buy. It sounds like as uppity as the Evo boys are over there on EvoM,they were right. Very different motors. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: progressi 3. The LSD in the sports version is a gear type LSD and not a clutch type. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I never really thought about it either way,but GRM seems to prefer the clutch LSD for it's progressive and predictable nature,among other things. http://grassrootsmotorsports.com/articles/whats-diff/ |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Again, my points from earlier still stand. Using either different grades of parts (such as powdered sintered vs forged) or different parts suppliers (Mahle vs whoever) doesn't change that they are basically the same engine. Likewise, having different mounting for different manifolds aren't that uncommon...doesn't change that the basic head design is, again, the same. Now, one interesting thing would be "Could I swap a mitsu head onto a hyundai block?" Again, this would prove beyond a doubt that these engines are for all intents and purposes, identical. His point on the cam is fairly specious since we don't know in what respects the engineer was talking. Was he comparing cam specs? Doubt it since any reasonable engineer would know they can't blindly look at a cam and derive that the specs are identical....BUT, one can look and reasonably approximate distances b/w journal, journal sizes, length, etc to conclude within reason that the cams are identical enough to swap in place of each other. I'm fairly certain the engineer saw enough to conclude it's a safe bet. Let's offer another analogy, since there is a billion left to use: The gen 1 350 chevy and L98's. You couldn't simply swap on an intake manifold from the L98 to the gen1 350, nor likewise swap a gen 1 manifold to an L98. Sure, they used different parts for pistons/rods/etc; Hell, you couldn't even simply swap cams among that engine due to the different provisions one had for roller cams...but there is no denying that they are basically the same engine. Take it further to one that's even further differentiated than the gen1 and L98...the gen1 and LT1...yet, for all their differences, still the same basic engine. All this blog demonstrated is the amount of cognitive dissonance that evo-fan-boi's are experiencing over their precious evo sharing basic engines w/ hyundai's and calibers. Maybe their experiencing side-effects from wearing too much hair gel and axe cologne? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Well how far do you want to generalize this? It's the same motor because it's a four-cylinder, it's the same motor because they're both turbocharged, etc. I mean sure they're going to share a ton of similarities because they're both based off the "world motor" or whatever, but the Hyundai version also has many, many differences that most would call inferior. The rods are allegedly inferior The pistons are allegedly inferior The block is allegedly inferior The intake/exhaust manifolds are different The turbo is different The head is who knows (though I doubt it's the same personally) These all add up, and I'm not trying to rain on any Hyundai fanboi's parade, it's probably one of my most anticipated new cars in a loooooong time (2.0t R-Spec plz) but sure there are similarities, everyone knows it's BASED off the world motor, but it's obvious (and comes as no surprise) that some compromises were made. I guess time will tell when more people tear them open and actually get some more quantitative data though. My personal hope is that 400ish whp will be attainable with the stock bottom end but we'll see |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Nobody said they were identical, what was said is that they use the same architecture and they are in the same family. Not the family of all four bangers, but much more closely related than that. cheers, scott |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: SpcNA[ZX *SNIFF* IT'S NOT THE SAME!!!! Okay, the mopar 273 v8 and 340 mopar are basically the same engine. Yes, they do use different rods, crank, pistons, valves, different (and uninterchangable) intake manifolds, different exhaust manifolds, different VALVES (omg!!!), blah, blah, blah, blah. Doesn't change either from being basically the SAME engine. The ford 302 and the mopar 273 are different engines too. They TOO use different rods, pistons, intake manifolds (uninterchangable too!), different exhaust manifolds, different valves, blah blah blah blah blah. Oh, sure...they're both v8's, NA, use distributers, and are generally mounted at the front of vehicles, so there going to be some similarities. Listen, they're world motors. They are basically the same engine. I didn't say each were as capable, nor did I even imply it (although basically, they are). To act as if they're as related as a honda and toyota 4 cylinders is fucking retarded. To act as if they are only distant cousins is fucking retarded. They are two brothers as similar as can be without being identical. This is the nature of engine families...stop grasping at straws and learn to live with it. I mean, it's hilarious...watching the mitsu fanboi's squirm is like watching Paris Hilton refusing to accept a sister she discovers living in a trailer park; "Like, omg! she's so....*bleh*!" |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: orangegrey Originally Posted By: progressi 3. The LSD in the sports version is a gear type LSD and not a clutch type. Or every few events, if you're an autocrosser. Gear-type FTW for cars that are driven on the street as well as raced. Still, for $27k I think I'd rather have a new mustang. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
This sounds a LOT like the 4g64 vs 4gcs pretty much the Only similarity was the block-casting, And even THEN, there were huge differences. Although.. a 4g64 crank, rods, and pistons meant you got a tall-deck big-bore motor that mitsu never actually made. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: SpcNA[ZX ] My personal hope is that 400ish whp will be attainable with the stock bottom end but we'll see I believe there are videos on Youtube that affirm this. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Um,Eric Hsu,IIRC is a guy that runs a shop that mods alot of stuff other than Mitsus,in fact I think they do a ton of Subie stuff. Im sure someone else knows this. I think they have a Genesis on order to build parts for it. Seems to me that there were alot of posts saying "a tune and bolt-ons=100whp like the Evo,cuz it's the same". Doesnt appear that way. As far as Mitsu pedigree? LOL Im not so concerned by that. DSMs danced with Neons in the past. Edit:XS engineering's site shows that they have a Skyline project cars,support Subaru WRX,and Evos. Eric Hsu being a jaded Evo fanboy? I dont think so. I thought it was an interesting writeup. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Needs moar 4g63 /thread |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: UglyValiant I mean, it's hilarious...watching the mitsu fanboi's squirm is like watching Paris Hilton refusing to accept a sister she discovers living in a trailer park; "Like, omg! she's so....*bleh*!" Apparently you missed the part where I said I'm eagerly anticipating the 2.0t R-Spec's release, and affirmed that sure they're all "based" off the world motor platform. If you think I'm brand-uppity because I have a few mitsu's in my past then you're obviously misinformed. I think the ONLY thing they got right was the motor in ANY mitsu I've owned, and even then they have their quirks. All these people saying "It's g0t an EbO Mot0r DoG!" are just wrong, are they similar? Sure thing, they're about as similar as a motor can be with different rods, pistons, block, head, etc. Kinda like Danny DeVito and Arnie in twins Alright, that's stretching it but as I said before for as many similarities there are differences. Do I care? Nah not really, I'm just anxious to see how the 2.0t responds to mods |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Oohhh, I just dropped some Mahles in my car! Now I can make Evo type power!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
People were concerned about the similarities because of power potential. Now that we see that the pistons and rods are not the same, I think it is impossible to say they are the same. I am disappointed. I was expecting the 2.0t to possibly handle 350whp. It doesn't seem like that is going to be the case. Oh well... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
... just tossing this out there... but... couldn't you just swap the mitsu motor in for the hyundai version? ? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
yes. I'm like 37% sure. the only way it's a "no" is if hyundai uses a different batch of Sensors/locations They most-likely use the same motor-mounts. that's the idea, isn't it? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
mitsu guys getting their panties in a bunch? no waiiiiiii anyways, we will have to wait and see what the stock 2.0T can handle... im sure itll do 300whp no prob(most likely more). ... thats just based off other "weak" motors doing that already... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Whathefuckyouthinkgyourallspecialhondavtekvrooomvroomyeahright4g64tf&tfalloveryourassgetsome!!!!!!!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I think it's going to be hard to make over 300whp, based on what I've read so far. I am worried about hyundai putting some thin ass rods in there, and a bunch of other cheap parts, which explains why the car is so cheap. Moreover, the turbo is way too small to perform at that power level. I was hoping this car would be like the old DSM; minor tweaks and big power. My faith is no longer. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Whathefuckobviousleyyouhaven'theardabouttheebolushunmadebymitsubishiitgoesvroomvroomandnotlikeamazdaplustheyaresofasttheydrivethemselvezzzzz http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2-zS7KhmY4 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: SpcNA[ZX ...are they similar? Sure thing, they're about as similar as a motor can be with different rods, pistons, block, head, etc. Kinda like Danny DeVito and Arnie in twins They are certainly as similar as a NA cobra 4.6 v8 and that of a blown cobra 4.6. Basically the same. Trust me, you don't change crank/rods/pistons/manifolds of your small block ford and end up with a small block chevy. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
That's great, so like I said in the previous posts they're derived from the world motor platform, have a lot of similarities, and are about as similar as two motors can be that have different rods, pistons, block, manifolds, turbo, possibly head etc. etc. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Ah, clearly brevity is thy enemy. Admitting they are the same engine is much simpler. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
They're definitely based off the same platform of motor |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Meh. Mags are getting low 15's out of these with a TD04 turbo. I don't see anything killer without a turbo upgrade. I was hoping the underated rumors were true. Still a kick ass car for the price. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I *heard* it was about the size of a 13G, with a 3" turbo-back exhaust, intake filter, and boost controller they might be able to eek out some high 13s or low 14s maybe? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
[/QUOTE] |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
i agree it will probably be a struggle for the turbo to hit that, but i dont see why the bottom end cant withstand 300 whp.... unless there is a real big screw up ala mazdaspeed 6 or osmething.. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Yea, that bottom end looks beefier than a b16a, rods specifically and you can make 400whp all day stock block. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'm sure some of you have seen this vid. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_UN0cvXr7g |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Wow..those rods look pretty beefy for sure. We will have to wait I guess... The verdict is not out yet. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Jeez you guys, this is like arguing what the definition of "is" is. The two engines come from the same engine family, but here to prevent defining them as "the same." "They are the same basic engine design using different major components including internals, manifolds, turbocharger, (ECU?) and supporting hardware. By all but the most generic definition, there are enough significant differences in componentry and capability that prevents referring to them as one and the same." Problem solved. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Edmunds dyno. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Euphoric,is this puke and die? If it is,is it Mitsu's fault? Will it be responsive at 1200 rpm? And finally,would it be fun to drive? Before the "other" Euphy comes out,Im just messing with you. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Not bad for an advertised 210hp if it's pumping out 197 to the wheels! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Yeah,I just think this car wouldve been so cool if was closer to 3000 lbs. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: progressi Yeah,I just think this car wouldve been so cool if was closer to 3000 lbs. I forget.. how heavy is the 2.0T? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: SpcNA[ZX ]Not bad for an advertised 210hp if it's pumping out 197 to the wheels! Tell me about it. Only about 180-190 of my advertised 232hp are getting to the wheels. lol Mazda |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Moof Originally Posted By: progressi Yeah,I just think this car wouldve been so cool if was closer to 3000 lbs. I forget.. how heavy is the 2.0T? Hyundai says 3300 pounds. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Damn... Seriously, how hard is it to make a 2500lbs coupe these days? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
A stripper Hyundai Accent is 2500lbs, so pretty hard unfortunately. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
At any rate, it still seems like a tempting deal. ALTHOUGH I just stumbled upon a local 04 Z06 for 28K |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: LowTech302 A stripper Hyundai Accent is 2500lbs, so pretty hard unfortunately. An accent with the 2.0T would be a riot. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Guys I'm getting an Error 404. It says "4G63 not found". |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
motortrend video of the 2.0T http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9b2E_zaeho 15.2 @ 90 mph. boo urnssss hopefully it WILL respond to simply mods...but 17 psi already? sick braking though! v6 drag race against stang gt and 370z http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77MstcS02Z8 wowzers the z is quick |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Moof At any rate, it still seems like a tempting deal. ALTHOUGH I just stumbled upon a local 04 Z06 for 28K um wat? 28k why the fuck havent you bought it... probably bs/doesnt exist. stupid trader is famous for that bs these days... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Euphoric motortrend video of the 2.0T http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9b2E_zaeho 15.2 @ 90 mph. boo urnssss hopefully it WILL respond to simply mods...but 17 psi already? sick braking though! v6 drag race against stang gt and 370z http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77MstcS02Z8 wowzers the z is quick 370z trapping 107mph is serious business |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'm surprised how slow the Genesis is. It's not bad, but I was hoping more for a poor mans 370. Shit, the Mustang still appeals to me since it has a bit of room in the trunk and V8 powah. My friends GF works at Ford, I should ask if she can get me the employee discount. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Impulsive I'm surprised how slow the Genesis is. It's not bad, but I was hoping more for a poor mans 370. Shit, the Mustang still appeals to me since it has a bit of room in the trunk and V8 powah. My friends GF works at Ford, I should ask if she can get me the employee discount. If you want straight line performance, I tell everybody the same thing. "You will NOT find a better bang-for-the-buck car than the Mustang GT." The car itself is cheap, aftermarket is cheap, OEM replacements are cheap.. and my god can that thing crank out the HP. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
golly gosh darnit, jee willikers it sure is a duesy. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'm not surprised. I expected it to be slower than those two cars. This is Hyundai's first attempt at a semi-serious sports car. They did well in my opinion. At least to me it looks the best out of the three. Also, Hyundai has always been behind in the car game and this proves that they still are. They are catching up, but there is still work to do. Not saying the Genesis is a subpar product, because it is a great product for Hyundai. In the general automotive realm though, it is a mediocre product. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: progressi Um,Eric Hsu,IIRC is a guy that runs a shop that mods alot of stuff other than Mitsus,in fact I think they do a ton of Subie stuff. Im sure someone else knows this. I think they have a Genesis on order to build parts for it. Seems to me that there were alot of posts saying "a tune and bolt-ons=100whp like the Evo,cuz it's the same". Doesnt appear that way. As far as Mitsu pedigree? LOL Im not so concerned by that. DSMs danced with Neons in the past. Edit:XS engineering's site shows that they have a Skyline project cars,support Subaru WRX,and Evos. Eric Hsu being a jaded Evo fanboy? I dont think so. I thought it was an interesting writeup. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Moof If you want straight line performance, I tell everybody the same thing. The 2010 with the optional track pack pulls .92g and slaloms almost as fast as the Ford GT. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I just read a new article in Road and Track and they liked everything about the Mustang,but said it still drives extremeley nose heavy,jumps sideways over bumps while cornering (stick axle),and the steering is overly numb. They liked everything else about it,and commented that the interior was nice (this is the third time in 3 mags Ive read this) and the liked the new Olephin dash material. I found that personally funny as the soft-touch dash in DSMs is called elephant skin by DSM fans (DanL) hehehe. And ditto on the track pack,they highly recommended it. I know when I drove the new Mustang I really liked how much better it was inside,and it still drove like the old Fox. Autoweek found that true also. Oh,and how close was the slalom to the GT? Because a MPH advantage is signifigant. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
R&T got 69.3 mph in the slalom FWIW. I am actually kind of exciting to see this car. The Genesis is nice, but it's about the exact same price as a GT here. The one thing I really like about the Genesis is the smart key - so convenient - otherwise the Ford seems to beat it in power, handling, interior, options etc. They also say it's very quiet when cruising and nothing beats the sound or throttle response of a V8. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: cliff st-clair I'm not surprised. I expected it to be slower than those two cars. This is Hyundai's first attempt at a semi-serious sports car. They did well in my opinion. At least to me it looks the best out of the three. Also, Hyundai has always been behind in the car game and this proves that they still are. They are catching up, but there is still work to do. Not saying the Genesis is a subpar product, because it is a great product for Hyundai. In the general automotive realm though, it is a mediocre product. I really don't think it is a "mediocre product" compared to the industry. It comes in at a lower price than any RWD coupe by a good margin with the turbo4. I would think its really going to compete with alot of FWD compacts, as it replaced the tiburon (last year 08?) and is in the ballpark of GTI/Si/Mspeed and so on. When you look at the v6 base @ 25,000 it also undercuts the Z by a pretty margin. I mean first thing most consumers will do is drool over the shape and want it regardless if its slower than the z or mustang or not. And I also don't believe hyundai ever called the car a "Z or mustang beater" or anything like that. Its just a nice looking rwd coupe with a nice looking interior, great warranty and good price. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
It's a solid product for the price to me and good for Hyundai for actually making a RWD sporty car - even if it's not really a sport compact. It still comes with decent hardware (Torsen, brembo's, good options) and a good price. I was hoping for something that swung above it's price point for the 3.8 version and it really doesn't. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
The new Mustang with the track pack and an immediate FRP catalog. Not a second thought about it for me. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'm with the SvA bandwagon on the fat critique. The Genesis needs a massive weight reduction. As a 4B11 Evo owner, I am excited about the 2.0T coupe, not against it. I want to see it thrive! Progress, I'm against you on the Rustang. You should be shot for even being interested in one since you have a Vette (real sports car), unlike the Stang (shatbox). Yes, its better than last year with the track pack options, facelift and Bullitt underpinnings, but its still an overwrought land turd with a solid axle. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Your automotive ADD is scary. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Lawerence Originally Posted By: cliff st-clair I'm not surprised. I expected it to be slower than those two cars. This is Hyundai's first attempt at a semi-serious sports car. They did well in my opinion. At least to me it looks the best out of the three. Also, Hyundai has always been behind in the car game and this proves that they still are. They are catching up, but there is still work to do. Not saying the Genesis is a subpar product, because it is a great product for Hyundai. In the general automotive realm though, it is a mediocre product. I really don't think it is a "mediocre product" compared to the industry. It comes in at a lower price than any RWD coupe by a good margin with the turbo4. I would think its really going to compete with alot of FWD compacts, as it replaced the tiburon (last year 08?) and is in the ballpark of GTI/Si/Mspeed and so on. When you look at the v6 base @ 25,000 it also undercuts the Z by a pretty margin. I mean first thing most consumers will do is drool over the shape and want it regardless if its slower than the z or mustang or not. And I also don't believe hyundai ever called the car a "Z or mustang beater" or anything like that. Its just a nice looking rwd coupe with a nice looking interior, great warranty and good price. Hey, you are entitled to your opinion. But to me, you look at the v6 version, you have to compare it to the base 370z, GXp soltice and the Mustang GT, because those are its closest competitors. The 4 cylinder version should be compared to the Civic Si, the GTi and other sport compacts. What I've found is that the Genesis does not really shine when compared to its closest competitors. I mean; 15.2@91 for the 2.0t is mediocre nowadays. The V6 running low 14 is reminiscent of y2k when the S2k came out. I mean, if we can say that kind of performance is mediocre for a car like the Si so we must be fair and say it is so for the Genesis as well, especially when you have 13sec stock Cobalts running around out there, and suvs deep in the 13s and 14s. Skidpad numbers for the Genesis are also nothing to write home about, not when you have a stock 370z pulling almost 1g in every review you read. Let's face it; the Genesis lacks gopower and it lacks handling prowess. It will never be among the best in its class with those shortcomings. Hence the mediocre appellation. Its best assets are looks and price, but those two alone do not define a great product. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I think Hyundai was aiming high but honestly fell a little short of unrealistic expectations. Hyundai will take a few more years to rival nissan or honda. They put out a rwd coupe (turbo) that is set to do battle with fwd civics and gti's. It's a great package in it's class. But it doesn't have quite the polish of the next level up |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Hey! Its not for ME,its for HIM! (pointing at Impulsive) Dude you are so crazy with the Impulsive buying,maybe you two should trade screennames. LOL Can you make a post about WHY you did this? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: progressi Hey! Its not for ME,its for HIM! (pointing at Impulsive) Dude you are so crazy with the Impulsive buying,maybe you two should trade screennames. LOL Can you make a post about WHY you did this? After purchasing the BMW, we got surprise pregnant with baby #2 (who arrived Saturday!!!!!!!!!!). Talked to a dealership that has Mitsubishi and BMW about 3 hours form here, got way more than my trade was worth and $7499 off the Evo's MSRP and 0% interest for 5 years. I dropped my payment substantially, knocked a year and a half off my payoff term, and have ample room for my new son in the back. I liked the BMW more, I need the Evo more. I saved over $13,000 doing this. Throwing a little cash, the amount I financed on this Evo is less than what I financed on the last Evo. If I was smarter, I would have kept the IX long ago and not had automotive tourette syndrome. If I dump this car someday, it'll be for a beater. Got $1400/month daycare bills to pay now, son! Cars seem like child's play compared to that. (Heck, so does my house). Daycare sucks. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: NoiZe Originally Posted By: progressi Hey! Its not for ME,its for HIM! (pointing at Impulsive) Dude you are so crazy with the Impulsive buying,maybe you two should trade screennames. LOL Can you make a post about WHY you did this? After purchasing the BMW, we got surprise pregnant with baby #2 (who arrived Saturday!!!!!!!!!!). Talked to a dealership that has Mitsubishi and BMW about 3 hours form here, got way more than my trade was worth and $7499 off the Evo's MSRP and 0% interest for 5 years. I dropped my payment substantially, knocked a year and a half off my payoff term, and have ample room for my new son in the back. I liked the BMW more, I need the Evo more. I saved over $13,000 doing this. Throwing a little cash, the amount I financed on this Evo is less than what I financed on the last Evo. If I was smarter, I would have kept the IX long ago and not had automotive tourette syndrome. If I dump this car someday, it'll be for a beater. Got $1400/month daycare bills to pay now, son! Cars seem like child's play compared to that. (Heck, so does my house). Daycare sucks. Oh god for your kids sake I hope they didnt get the melon heads |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: HoustonRSX for your kids sake I hope they didnt get the melon heads LOL! Sophia was 55 percentile body and 98% head as a baby. I'm sure will be the same, they are junior melons. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: NoiZe Originally Posted By: HoustonRSX for your kids sake I hope they didnt get the melon heads LOL! Sophia was 55 percentile body and 98% head as a baby. I'm sure will be the same, they are junior melons. LOL well at least you know where to shop for hats already. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Recaro baby seat. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: danl Recaro baby seat. Have had since Evo VIII. Forward facing second one needs to wait a year. I'm not doing a convertible, and I want one just like the one I already have so he can use it several years. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Congrats Noize!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I just thought you were done for sure with Evos this time! :p I bought used this time around because I sold mine too soon and wanted to limit how many times I was going to eat depreciation. Still,I think the Evo X is awesome for it's response to mods,very few cars that can hold a candle to it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: NoiZe Got $1400/month daycare bills to pay now, son! I ain't NEVER have'n kids!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Sounds like it'd almost be cheaper to have someone quit a job and "make millions, working from home!!!" =0[ |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
lol ya, stay at home mom/dad ftw....that is if the one of you can make enough coin |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: NoiZe Got $1400/month daycare bills to pay now, son! Shoot, is that all? Mine push $1650!!! thank goodness my oldest starts kindergarden this fall congrats on the second kid |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
nike air max running shoes christian louboutin outlet Air Max 90 Adidas Shoes Discount Marketplace Nike Air Jordan 11 scarpe hogan outlet ugg clearance Adidas Originals Superstar Oakley Sunglasses Cheap Kobe Shoes Nike Nike Shoes Discount Marketplace cheap uggs Air Max Pas Cher Original Ugg Boots canada goose jackets on sale nike mercurial soccer cleats chaussure Nike homme zapatillas running Doudoune Moncler Femme Pas Cher Jordan Sneakers For Sale toms sale Pandora Store Sale Adidas Originals Stan Smith Canada Goose Outlet new yeezy shoes ugg store Ray Ban Sunglasses Online moncler jacket sale Ray ban sale online Nike Air Sneakers Nike Shoes Sale Store Michael Kors nike schuhe günstig The official UGG fitflops sale uk Canada Goose Outlet adidas outlet Nike Zapatos Michael Kors Handbags Discount pandora outlet store air force one pas cher Nike Online Store adidas store Nike Air Women goedkope nike air max Coach Bags On Sale Air Nike Air Max Sneakers Adidas Neo Discount Sale converse store Hugo Boss Sale Pandora Store zapatillas nike baratas Nike Shox Cheap Ray-Ban Official Discounted Site new jordan releases UGG BOOTS FOR WOMEN Boost Yeezy Sale On Line uggs outlet nike jordan shoes zapatilla adidas ADIDAS NMD SALE ON LINE religion store Discount Air Max pandora jewelry store nfl store huarache sneakers longchamp bags on sale Negozi Pandora Nike Roshe Run Sale nike joggesko Boutique Ugg moncler outlet TOMS SHOES OUTLET nike air abercrombie and fitch store Jordan Shoes Air nike shoes Doudoune Moncler Pas Cher zapatos de futbol nike chaussure basket homme Canada goose dam Nike Air Huarache For Sale billige nike sko Chaussure Nike Air Max Pas Cher Nike Soccer Cleats Boots Moncler Sale Uggs Pas Cher Soldes Michael Kors Outlet Nike Air Max Goedkoop botas de futbol Pandora Official Website louboutin heels Ugg boots Sale Yeezy Black Hogan Outlet cheap nike air max Nike Factory Store new pandora charms Cheap Michael Kors Vans Black Sneakers Jordan Schoenen Soccer Boots Outlet nike prada outlet canada goose jacket outlet Nike Air Pas Cher Scarpe Air Max nike air jordan pas cher nike sportschuhe hogan scontate Air Max Kopen Air Jordan Retro Sale Air max dam Air max levně Timberland Outlet cheap uggs for women newest lebron shoes ugg factory outlet Descuentos Nike Yeezy Boost Sale Online Nike Air Max Cheap Pandora Store Nike Shox discount Sale nike sb stefan janoski Ugg Pas Cher En France nike sneakers Ugg Outlet Online Store Stone Island Outlet Moncler Jackets Discount Marketplace Moncler Outlet Online scarpe nike Doudoune Moncler Site Officiel Nike Air Damen womens nike air max Air Max Femme Boty Nike Air Adidas Superstar Bottes Ugg Femme Pas Cher Yeezy Shoes Discount Marketplace Adidas Superstar Sale Online Moncler Outlet Store Ugg Pas Cher Femme nike tn pas cher pandora beads Nike Air 90 chaussures nike pas cher Canada Goose Womens Coats reebok running shoes retro jordans for cheap günstige nike schuhe Yeezy Men official NHL jerseys Nike Store Toms Outlet Online uggs for women vans shoe store Nike Pas Cher Femme Jordan Store toms shoes outlet coach factory outlet online Uggs For Cheap ypMs 2017.3.21 |